VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > Safety
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-04-2014, 03:25 PM
sailvi767 sailvi767 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 1,165
Default A very lucky pilot! (LI Iron Battery)

http://www.heavenboundaviation.com/d...eryfirePDF.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-04-2014, 03:43 PM
Airzen Airzen is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 166
Default Wow..

Simply astonishing. I was considering Aerovoltz battery after reading some favorable comments on LiFePo batteries on VAF. Now there is no way ...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-04-2014, 04:59 PM
Lemmingman's Avatar
Lemmingman Lemmingman is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 689
Default

I cant tell if the OP is the original author of the linked pdf. Since this happened in March I wonder if the manufacturer has a comment about this incident. No mention of whether they wanted the battery back to investigate the cause.
__________________
Gil Brice
McKinney, TX EAA-1246
RV7 - Working on fuse, fuel, brakes etc...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-04-2014, 05:04 PM
sailvi767 sailvi767 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 1,165
Default

I am not the author. It would have expected the manufacturer to have requested the battery back and try and determine the cause. I have no knowledge if that has happened.

George
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-04-2014, 05:39 PM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,514
Default

It looks bad, but is consistent with other conclusions from VAF threads - put it in a stainless steel box and vent overboard. At least it did not burst into flames. And take an airplane with it.

Now the discussion about what set it off. . .

edit: I stand corrected on the flames -after landing and exposing, it did have flames. I was referring to a burst cell case where the contents violently spewed gas, liquid and flames. This post was a bit tongue in cheek as I have posted previously that just because it has IRON in it (alone), does not make it safe. It can still have an exotherm, as exhibited here. The LiFePh chemistries have a lower peak exotherm temperature that allows case containment, but is still over 300C. I still don't believe we have a reliable installation and management procedure, short of the sealed, vented overboard, stainless battery box.
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”

Last edited by BillL : 12-05-2014 at 07:08 AM. Reason: corrected erroneous statement.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-04-2014, 06:35 PM
sailvi767 sailvi767 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 1,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillL View Post
It looks bad, but is consistent with other conclusions from VAF threads - put it in a stainless steel box and vent overboard. At least it did not burst into flames. And take an airplane with it.

Now the discussion about what set it off. . .
I believe it did burst into flames but after the aircraft was on the ground. Proper venting would be critical. A smoking Litium battery is not survivable in a enclosed cockpit. The fumes will quickly incapacitate the pilot. A firewall mounted battery would be better in that situation then the location in my six between the rudder pedals. I don't believe this battery fire would have been survivable in my aircraft.

George
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-04-2014, 06:37 PM
ColoRv's Avatar
ColoRv ColoRv is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tampa (BKV)
Posts: 926
Default

Vent overboard? How about diet to save the 10lbs and put a real battery on board. If he were cruising anywhere near the altitudes I cruise at....he would have been in serious trouble. 17500 is a long ways from the ground with smoke in the cockpit. Especially in an aircraft like the -8 with the battery inside and I dont think it's very easy to stick your head out of an RV in flight like he was able to.

I've been on fire in race cars....it isn't fun. I simply can't fathom risking my life, leaving my family without me....for 10lbs, or 100 for that matter.
__________________
RV-8 Flying
1,235th flying RV8
SARL Race#95
SnF Homebuilt Judge

2015 Sun n Fun Kit Built Reserve Grand Champion
2015 Oshkosh Kit Built Champion
2015 Jeffco Kit Built Grand Champion
2014 Oshkosh Outstanding Workmanship Award

Broken Warrior of the Jarhead Clan

Last edited by ColoRv : 12-04-2014 at 06:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-04-2014, 07:54 PM
donaziza's Avatar
donaziza donaziza is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 743
Default

United Airlines had trouble with Lithium batteries on their new 787's. FAA grounded them for a while. I think one started smoking on the ramp in Japan. Don't know what Boeing did for a fix, but it might be worth looking into. (I "think" something about a sealed box and ventilation is what I heard, but I'm honestly not sure)

Just a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-04-2014, 08:38 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by donaziza View Post
United Airlines had trouble with Lithium batteries on their new 787's. FAA grounded them for a while. I think one started smoking on the ramp in Japan. Don't know what Boeing did for a fix, but it might be worth looking into. (I "think" something about a sealed box and ventilation is what I heard, but I'm honestly not sure)

Just a thought.
Just to keep this thread on track, I do not believe that the 787 Lithium battery was a Lithium IRON battery. Not all "Lithium" battteriies use the same chemistry, and they have significantly different characteristics.


The Aerovolts IS LiFePo, and it would be very interesting to hear more facts on this incident..
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com

Last edited by Ironflight : 12-05-2014 at 09:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2014, 12:02 AM
SHIPCHIEF SHIPCHIEF is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,412
Default

Just a counter point:
Lead Acid batteries fail too. Last week, my brother had one on a charger that blew about 1/3 of the top off. I was talking to him on the phone when it happened, and I heard it very well over the phone.
Not a smelly smoking mess with a fire. A big blast with the top of the battery case blown off.
I don't know which will be the more damaging, or which type has the greatest failure rate.
My RV-8 shed about 70 pounds when I removed the Mazda turbo rotary engine, and replaced it with a lightened parallel valve IO-360 w/ CATTO 3 blade prop. It now weighs 1035 lbs with wheel pants! Needless to say, the CG shifted aft. I removed the PC680 from behind the baggage bulkhead today. Now I can remove a couple of pounds of battery cable too.
I never liked the battery being in the back, it's hard to get to it for inspection or replacement, and it's not really isolated from the passenger compartment.
I'll put the battery on the firewall, low, and away from the fuel system.
I'm leaning toward a LiFePO4 with built in charge management circuits. I'm open to the idea of a vented case and/or a battery temp monitor.
__________________
Scott Emery
http://gallery.eaa326.org/v/members/semery/
EAA 668340, chapter 326 & IAC chapter 67
RV-8 N89SE first flight 12/26/2013
Yak55M, and the wife has an RV-4
There is nothing-absolute nothing-half so much worth doing as simply messing around with Aeroplanes
(with apologies to Ratty)
2019

Last edited by SHIPCHIEF : 12-05-2014 at 12:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.